Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Black et al v. Michel et al
as 1:2021cv00881
Defendant:
Gary S. Michel, William F. Banholzer, Kirk S. Hachigian and others
Plaintiff:
Shieta Black and City of Miami General Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Retirement Trust
Nominal Defendant:
Jeld-Wen Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aldridge v. JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00135
Defendant:
William Banholzer, Gary S. Michel, Suzanne Stefany and others
Nominal Defendant:
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Aldridge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nautilus Insurance Co v. 200 Christian Street Partners, et al
as 19-1507
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH GORDON KLEHR, H/W, HARMAN DEUTSCH CORP, ARTHUR ELWOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. 200 CHRISTIAN STREET PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01545
Plaintiff:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
200 CHRISTIAN STREET PARTNERS, LLC, VIRGIL PROCACCINO, ARTHUR ELWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SHAH et al v. JELD-WEN, INC.
as 2:2017cv03355
Plaintiff:
SUSHRUT SHAH and PURVI PARIKH-SHAH
Defendant:
JELD-WEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
