Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RODRIGUEZ-HERNAND v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05816
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC. , WALMART STORES EAST, LP , JOHN DOES I-II and others
Plaintiff:
PAULA RODRIGUEZ-HERNAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BURGESS et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
BARBARA` A. BURGESS and MICHAEL BURGESS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and JOHN DOE I-II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONLISK et al v. OYSTER POINT HOTEL/MOLLY PITCHER INN, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
LINDA CONLISK and THOMAS CONLISK
Defendant:
OYSTER POINT HOTEL/MOLLY PITCHER INN, INC., WOODWARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , JOHN DOES I-II and others
Cross_claimant:
WOODWARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
OYSTER POINT HOTEL/MOLLY PITCHER INN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARTLETT et al v. HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BARTLETT and JOANN BARTLETT
Defendant:
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY , JOHN DOES I, II AND III and ABC AND XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
GOLPHIN v. ROSSITER et al
as 2:2013cv04164
Plaintiff:
MARKEA GOLPHIN
Defendant:
KENNETH ROSSITER, C. WATKINS and JOHN DOE I & II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER et al v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
ELLA BAKER and BENJAMIN FRYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JOHN DOES I-II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
GYNELLE HARVEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS FUGITIVE TASK FORCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
