Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Gervat v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse Brett Biggs, Melanie Boulden and others
LENTZ v. MURPHY 3RD
as 3:2023cv22489
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
ESQ. JOHN MURPHY 3RD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Erika King, Nona King, William King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mercurio et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brittany Paul, Deana Redden, Vincent Mercurio and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Murphy v. Mandiant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
Mandiant, Inc., Kevin R. Mandia, Enrique Salem and others
MURPHY v. MARLIN BUSINESS SERVICES CORP. et al
as 1:2021cv14118
Plaintiff:
JOHN MURPHY
Defendant:
MARLIN BUSINESS SERVICES CORP., JOHN J. CALAMARI, LAWRENCE J. DEANGELO and others
MURPHY v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv12228
Defendant:
SGT. DAVID H. WENTZ, SGT. RUDY RUIZ, DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY et al v. WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT OWNER LLC et al
as 2:2018cv10309
Plaintiff:
JOHN MURPHY , CAROLINE MURPHY , PATRICK HANRAHAN and others
Defendant:
WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT OWNER LLC, WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT TENANT LLC, POLLIN/MILLER HOSPITALITY STRATEGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
