Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WALSH v. MNAP MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 401(K) P/S PLAN
as 2:2022cv02025
Plaintiff:
SECRETARY OF LABOR and MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
MNAP MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 401(K) P/S PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMEN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parran v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv01522
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Laurel R. Harry, Scott F. Whalen and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Parran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JHANG et al v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
MYONG JA JHANG, KATHLEEN BANG WHAN CHANG and DONG IL KIM
Defendant:
PAUL DONG UK KIM, HAEKYONG KIM, KYUNG SOON KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peele v. Rapp et al
as 3:2013cv01854
Petitioner:
Tyrone Peele
Respondent:
Rapp, Kalski and PA State Attorney General
Defendant:
K. P. Reisinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Langeheine et al
as 3:2013cv01820
Plaintiff:
Brett M. Peters
Defendant:
Langeheine, Hubler, Lan Tiggart and others
Amicu:
K. P. Reisinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adderly v. Harry et al
as 3:2013cv01465
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L. Adderly
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, McIntel, P.R.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Fanelli et al
as 1:2012cv02385
Plaintiff:
Jerome P. Evans
Defendant:
Fanelli, K. P. Reisinger, The P.R.C Misconduct Review Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
