Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Gregory Robinson v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 15-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, LT. TRADER, LT. MARK D. DAUM and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, MAJOR SCAROBOROUGH, STAFF LT. KAREN HAWKINS and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Phelps, et al
as 15-1803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLIEN and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 14-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLEIN and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
De Shawn Drumgo v. Reginald Brown, et al
as 12-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE SHAWN DRUMGO
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BROWN, THOMPSON, JAMES THOMAS and others
Biggins v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Thorpe
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
