Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Murray v. Michael Ostrowski, et al
as 23-2901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL OSTROWSKI, Family Court Judge, DAVID RYAN NUSSEY, Attorney, ASHLEY BATTAGLIA, Salem County DCP&P Case Worker and others
MURRAY v. OSTROWSKI et al
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. MURRAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. OSTROWSKI, DAVID RYAN NUSSEY, ASHLEY BATTAGLIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURRAY v. IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC et al
as 3:2018cv13059
Plaintiff:
JAMIE L MURRAY and JAMIE MURRAY
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MURRAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv42465
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. MURRAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURRAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv39300
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. MURRAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURRAY v. H. K. PORTER, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79658
Plaintiff:
M. L. MURRAY
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER, INC., GAF CORPORATION, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72001
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. MURRAY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72004
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. MURRAY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARSETH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33343
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. MURRAY and JEFFREY L. MURRAY
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
