Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Kavanaugh v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Edinger, L. Potter, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kavanaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Moneyham v. David Ebbert, et al
as 17-2432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MONEYHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT, ANDREW EDINGER, FRANCES FISCIANA and others
Defendant:
WAYNE, Optometrist at USP Lewisburg
Moneyham v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, Andrew Edinger, Frances Fisciana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid et al v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Reid, Kareem Hassan Milhouse, Eric Houston and others
Defendant:
J. Ebbert, Jeana Mitterling, M. Barner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POTTER v. SUNSATIONS, et al.
as 3:2015cv05730
Plaintiff:
JODY L. POTTER
Defendant:
SUNSATIONS and SUNSATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moneyham v. Potter et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Defendant:
L. Potter, M Barth and Messenman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Juan Diaz, Jr. v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri, et al
as 14-4676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, REGIONAL DIRECTOR and others
Mendez v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv01651
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mendez
Defendant:
J Thomas, J Butler, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
