Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Langford v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01736
Defendant:
PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Healthcare Informatics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Kramer et al v. Philips Respironics, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Kramer, Angelica Quintana and Reginald Langford
Defendant:
PHILIPS RESPIRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RRF Building, LLC et al v. Excel Development Group et al
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
RRF Building, LLC and Sophie Marie Langford
Defendant:
Excel Development Group, Netanel Invest USA, Inc. and Michael Heletz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Terry Langford v. Warden Allenwood FCI
as 23-1331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY L. LANGFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
Terry LangfordIn re: Terry Langford
as 23-1245
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY L. LANGFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI and YVETTE KANE
Finger v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Hamilton v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamilton
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
MARSHALL v. GEO RIVERS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
DARAYA MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO RIVERS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ADMINISTRATOR BRICK TRIPP, MR. HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shumacher v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
