Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv08794
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2025cv02514
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramos and Melissa Cintron
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Ramos et al v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2025cv01121
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramos
Defendant:
Nelson Jenkins, Keary Sellers, AUTOZONE and others
Cross-Complainant:
AUTOZONE
Cross-Defendant:
William Aichman, Thomas Dempsey, Gilberto Guitierrez and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
AUTOZONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
RAMOS v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMOS
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Luis Ramos Sica v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1702
Petitioner:
LUIS RAMOS SICA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RAMOS-SOTO et al v. C.R.BARD et al
as 2:2021cv01504
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMOS-SOTO and SYLANA RAMOS-SOTO
Defendant:
C.R.BARD and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMOS-SOTO et al v. C.R.BARD et al
as 2:2021cv01506
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMOS-SOTO and SYLANA RAMOS-SOTO
Defendant:
C.R.BARD, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00604
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLORES et al v. DK GROCERY INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02934
Defendant:
KHADAG SINGH, DALBIR SINGH and DK GROCERY INC.
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMOS, LUIS ANZURES, JOSE FLORES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luis Cruz v. Attorney General United States
as 20-1421
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
LUIS RAMOS CRUZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
