Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Austin v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Austin
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Deputy Warden Emig and Phillip Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCKRELL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63794
Plaintiff:
COY EDWARD COCKRELL and PATTIE LEE AUSTIN
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUSTIN v. WHITTING et al
as 2:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE AUSTIN
Defendant:
WHITTING and ALL MEDICAL MALPRACTICE & DELAYED DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATITIS HBU, HBV LIVER VIRUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Austin v. Franklin J. Tennis, et al
as 10-1158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH 10-1158 DEFENDANTS, KEVIN BURKE and PRISON HEALTH SER INC
Austin v. Varner et al
as 4:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Austin
Defendant:
Dorina Varner, James Michael Sutton, Kenneth R. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Austin v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BURKE
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, FRANKLIN TENNIS, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Michael Austin v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, KEVIN BURKE, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
AUSTIN v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv73995
Plaintiff:
RAEFORD LEE AUSTIN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Austin v. Beard et al
as 4:2007cv01833
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Austin
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Franklin J. Tennis, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Tennis et al
as 4:2007cv01693
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Austin
Defendant:
Franklin J. Tennis, Jeffrey Rackovan, Dennis Sager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
