Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Massaquoi v. McConaughey et al
as 3:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Manna Massaquoi
Defendant:
J. McConaughey, T. Deljanovan, S. A. Seese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinnard v. P.A. D.O.C. S.C.I. Smithfield et al
as 1:2015cv02082
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Kinnard, Jr.
Defendant:
P.A. D.O.C. S.C.I. Smithfield, PA D.O.C. Central Office Employees, Lisa Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wisniewski v. Fisher et al
as 3:2013cv02642
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wisniewski
Defendant:
Jon D. Fisher, R. Sue Hannah, Jay B. Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATT v. FISHER et al
as 1:2012cv02364
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pratt
Defendant:
J. Fisher, Lubert, Whitesal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATT v. FISHER et al
as 2:2012cv06151
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PRATT
Defendant:
J. FISHER, LUBERT, WHITESAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINTZ v. SEMPRAC LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2010cv03937
Plaintiff:
HAROLD P. MINTZ
Defendant:
SEMPRAC LABORATORIES , NEW SPRING CAPITAL PARTNERS , ZEV SCHERL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership
as 3:2008cv02255
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A., TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg LP
as 3:2008cv02122
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A., TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
