Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Luis Nivar Batista v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2745
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO NIVAR BATISTA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jose Tineo v. Attorney General United State
as 16-1461
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO TINEO, AKA Luis Alberto Padilla, AKA Jose Sanchez
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luis Mercedes-Sanchez v. Attorney General United State
as 15-3841
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO MERCEDES-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RODRIGUEZ LICEA et al v. CURACAO DRYDOCK COMPANY, INC.
as 3:2014mc00003
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO JUSTO RODRIGUEZ LICEA , FERNANDO ALONSO HERNANDEZ and LUIS ALBERTO CASANOVA TOLEDO
Defendant:
CURACAO DRYDOCK COMPANY, INC.
PADILLA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALBERTO PADILLA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hernandez-Cruz v. Attorney General USA
as 13-3288
Not Party - Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO HERNANDEZ-CRUZ
Not Party - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luis Vargas-Bonilla v. Attorney General United State
as 13-3147
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO VARGAS-BONILLA, a/k/a Luis Alberto Vargas a/k/a Luis Vargas a/k/a Antonio Hernandez-Naran
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PINA v. MAIORANA
as 3:2012cv00177
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO PINA
Respondent:
C. MAIORANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jimenez et al v. Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2012cv00701
Plaintiff:
Edwin Aguero Jimenez , Jorge Aguero Retana , Alberto Conejo Chacon and others
Defendant:
Dow Chemical Company , Occidental Chemical Corporation , Shell Oil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
