Cases 1 - 10 of 18
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv23036
Plaintiff:
MARK JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv20123
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARK JONES and MARTHA JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory, Tammy Gregory, Shannon Gregory, II and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
BRUCE F. TAUB, P.A. v. MERCATANTI et al
as 3:2021cv00712
Plaintiff:
BRUCE F. TAUB, P.A.
Defendant:
LOUIS MERCATANTI, ALAN LACAVA, GRACE CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04780
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and MARK JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv12721
Plaintiff:
MARK JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv05422
Plaintiff:
ANGELA JONES and MARK JONES
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv07034
Plaintiff:
ANGELA JONES and MARK JONES
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , SECANT MEDICAL, SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
