Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shabazz v. Pepper Hamilton, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01778
Defendant:
Frank Pennel, Pierce, Ron Hosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Haqq Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONICELLI v. FOCUS VENTURE PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv05331
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES CONICELLI
Defendant:
FOCUS VENTURE PARTNERS, INC., FOCUS WIRELESS, LLC, FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MDT PERSONNEL, LLC v. MONGELLUZZI et al
as 2:2010cv05719
Plaintiff:
MDT PERSONNEL, LLC
Defendant:
FRANK MONGELLUZZI and ANNE MONGELLUZZI
Counter_claimant:
FRANK MONGELLUZZI , ANNE MONGELLUZZI , ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICES, INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICES, INC. , ABLE BODY GULF COAST INC. , PROFESSIONAL STAFFING-A.B.T.S., INC. and others
Counter_defendant:
MDT PERSONNEL
Thirdparty_defendant:
MDT PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00409
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Asa Johnson v. Elizabeth Burris, et al
as 08-4321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASA P. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH BURRIS and TODD KRAMER, Counselor of MDT
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, Classification Lieutentant of MDT for SHU, MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM MDT FOR DE CORR CTR, INSTITUTIONAL BASED CLASSIFICATION COMM MEMBER JOHN DOE 2 and others
Johnson v. Burris et al
as 1:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Asa P. Johnson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Burris, Todd Kramer, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DDR MDT MONACA TOWNSHIP MARKETPLACE, LLC v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
as 2:2007cv01647
Plaintiff:
DDR MDT MONACA TOWNSHIP MARKETPLACE, LLC
Defendant:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
