Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McClenton et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00681
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Michael Wenerowicz, Tabb Bickell and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McClenton and Mumia Abu-Jamal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClenton v. Doe (1) Ms. Ryan et al
as 1:2019cv01958
Defendant:
John Doe 6 (Mr. Gutsie), Jane Doe (1) Ms. Ryan, Jane Doe 5 (C. Stanitis) and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McClenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLENTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv05828
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MCCLENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLENTON v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv04055
Plaintiff:
MARC A. MCCLENTON
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP. , NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. and HOLLAND, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MCCLENTON v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2014cv05321
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCCLENTON
Respondent:
VINCENT T. MOONEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADLEPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCLENTON v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72118
Plaintiff:
AARON MCCLENTON
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCLENTON v. 3M
as 2:2008cv69003
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT MCCLENTON
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCLENTON v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65917
Plaintiff:
SAM MCCLENTON and SAM MCCLENTON
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCLENTON v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65916
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT MCCLENTON and ROOSEVELT MCCLENTON
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
