Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DURAN et al v. THE WELFARE REFORM ACT CONGRESS UNKNOWN WHO PASS THE LAW et al
as 1:2014cv04120
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL DURAN, MICHELE L. BAXTER and G.A.M.D.
Defendant:
THE WELFARE REFORM ACT CONGRESS UNKNOWN WHO PASS THE LAW, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY UNKNOWN STAFF, BURLINGTON COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURAN v. RILEYS FIRM et al
as 1:2014cv04125
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant:
RILEYS FIRM, MICHAEL RILEY, TRACY RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Miguel Duran v. William Warner, et al
as 14-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WILLIAM WARNER, #FIII-606, OFFICER WILLIAM LOGAN, #495, JEREMY NIRENBURG, #K-781 and others
Miguel Duran v. Warner, et al
as 13-3830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WARNER, #FIII-606, WILLIAM LOGAN, #495, JEREMY NIRENBURG, #K-781 and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CITY MUNICIPALITY FUNDS
DURAN v. ATLANTIC COUNTY
as 1:2010cv04753
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Duran v. Bondiskey
as 10-3645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BONDISKEY, Warden
Miguel Duran v. Bruce Weeks, et al
as 10-2323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE WEEKS, ATL CITY MUN CT and ATL CITY PROS OFC
Miguel Duran v. Gary Merline, et al
as 10-2286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MERLINE, JAMES D. MURPHY, YVONNE HICKMAN, Principal Clerk and others
DURAN v. WARDEN BONDWASKI
as 1:2010cv02149
Petitioner:
MIGUEL DURAN
Respondent:
WARDEN BONDWASKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Duran v. Gary Merline, et al
as 10-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MERLINE, JAMES D. MURPHY, YVONNE HICKMAN, Principal Clerk and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
