Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TUCKER et al v. COMBS et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
KAREN TUCKER and JOHN DOE(S)
Defendant:
LEVI COMBS, III, PAMELA MILLER DABNEY, ALEXIS COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
PULLINS v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05481
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC. and MACY'S
Plaintiff:
BRYAN PULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIPPO v. PULLINS et al
as 2:2013cv05921
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. GRIPPO, III
Defendant:
MARQUIS R. PULLINS and CHENTEL N. DAVIS-PULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Freebery v. Town of Elsmere et al
as 1:2010cv00553
Plaintiff:
Ronald K. Freebery
Defendant:
Town of Elsmere, Elsmere Police Department, Gregg Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PULLIN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76637
Plaintiff:
RALPH E. PULLIN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PULLIN et al v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77334
Plaintiff:
FLORA M. PULLIN, FLORA M. PULLIN and WESLEY H. PULLIN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Keller v. Franklin Co. Court et al
as 3:2009cv00852
Plaintiff:
Courtney A. Keller
Defendant:
Franklin Co. Court, Judge Carol Van Horn, Paul Raymond Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
