Cases 1 - 10 of 15
COYLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
PETER P. COYLE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE EDWARDS, UPPER SAUCON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, PETER P. BUTTIGIEG, BLANE A. WORKIE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Heilimann v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2014cv01271
Plaintiff:
Ryan A Heilimann
Defendant:
Thomas O'Brien, Peter P Nemshick, Cory Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PULASKI v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84676
Plaintiff:
PETER P. PULASKI
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAGOWSKI v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55593
Plaintiff:
PETER P. NAGOWSKI
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MATTIOLI v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53451
Plaintiff:
PETER P. MATTIOLI
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SHAKINAS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51722
Plaintiff:
PETER P. SHAKINAS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
