Cases 1 - 10 of 15
KELLER v. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAWLINSON KELLER, III
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Swaziek v. Hochschild et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Stuart Swaziek
Defendant:
Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene, R. Mark Graf and others
Nominal Defendant:
Discover Financial Services
In Re Discover Financial Services Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Stuart Swaziek
Defendant:
Roger C. Hochschild, Thomas G. Maheras, Jeffrey S. Aronin and others
Nominal Defendant:
Discover Financial Services
ARICO v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 1:2021cv12355
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. d/b/a LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ARICO
ARICO v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 3:2021cv12355
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. doing business as LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ARICO
Petitioner:
Max Royal LLC, Seung R. Lee, Hee K. Lee and others
WATERMAN v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 2:2021cv00319
Defendant:
David Rawlinson, JONATHAN MILLER, Nancy Tellem and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Oram v. Nielsen Holdings PLC et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Defendant:
James A. Attwood Jr., David Rawlinson, Karen M. Hoguet and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Oram
RAWLINSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09794
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAWLINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAWLINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2016cv02112
Plaintiff:
DORIAN RAWLINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RAWLINSON v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv03260
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MARK RAWLINSON
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
