Cases 1 - 10 of 12
AIGBEKAEN v. HIGHTOWER, et al.
as 3:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Respondent:
WARDEN HIGHTOWER, DR. RABINOWITZ, HSA and others
Defendant:
LT. FRIEND, ONE UNKNOWN CORRECTIONS OFFICER, MR. VINGLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Aigbekaen v. Hightower et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Warden Hightower, Dr. Rabinowitz, HSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aigbekaen v. Director of the BOP et al
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Director of the BOP, Warden, Justin Eckenrode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AIGBEKAEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AIGBEKAEN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv13102
Respondent:
MR. HOSKINSONS, MR. LEE, DAVID ORTIZ and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond AigbekaenIn re: Raymond Aigbekaen
as 20-2435
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
PUGLIESE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv07972
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DOMINICK PUGLIESE and RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AIGBEKAEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv07189
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond Aigbekaen v. Bureau of Prisons
as 20-1351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
AIGBEKAEN v. HURWITZ et al
as 1:2020cv01517
Defendant:
E. BRADLY, US ATTORNEY OFFICE BALTIMORE, HURWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
