Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ANDREWS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13763
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREWS, ESTATE OF AMY RESHONDA, DECEASED and THE ESTATE OF AMY RESHONDA ANDREWS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW WOLTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. LOVETT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06666
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREWS
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGARREY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2011cv01123
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW MCGARREY
Defendant:
S. JOHNSON, T. SPAGNOULO, MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE W. BUSH, JR., RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUSSIE v. BUSH et al
as 1:2010cv04594
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. BUSSIE
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH , NANCY PELOSI , ROBERT ANDREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALVES, et al v. FERGUSON, et al
as 2:2001cv00789
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ALVES , RICHARD BAGAROZY , GRADY BROWN and others
Defendant:
GAIL FERGUSON , DAVID SAMSON , ALAN G. KAUFMAN and others
Consol_defendant:
OSCAR TORRES , JAMES DAVY and GRACE ROGERS
Consol_plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW MCGARREY , WILLIAM H. MOORE and MARY ANN HYSLER
Intervenor_plaintiff:
ROBERT DEAVERS
Consol_cross_claimant:
CMS MEDICAL SERVICE
Consol_cross_defendant:
GWENDOLYN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
