Cases 1 - 10 of 44
JONES v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS et al.
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Owens v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Chloe Walker, Amber Warick, Coran Phiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. Sage
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Robert A. Ruff
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RUFF v. RESONANT INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
BENNY RUFF
Defendant:
RESONANT INC., GEORGE B HOLMES, MICHAEL FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Dewald v. French et al
as 1:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Defendant:
Correctional Officer French, Correctional Officer Reed, Lieutenant Gary Arter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC v. RUFF et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
BEUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC and BEUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC doing business as BEUTLER INK
Defendant:
RHIANNON RUFF, Jennifer Karn, Sheri Cook-Sandve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUFF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv00851
Petitioner:
ROBERT RUFF
Respondent:
Federal Bureau (of) Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
