Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LANDLORD SERVICE BUREAU, INC. v. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION et al
as 2:2021cv00346
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DR. ROCHELLE WALENSKY, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LANDLORD SERVICE BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv17095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MEARS v. CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. et al
as 2:2014cv06259
Plaintiff:
KHALIF R. MEARS
Defendant:
CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. , STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION , SP PLUS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
AMTRAK , NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cross_defendant:
BRANDYWINE CIRA, LP., BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST, CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
