Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SCUDDER REALTY LLC v. SIS International Trade, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02105
Defendant:
Shir Gal, SIS International Trade, LLC and Sagi Gelman
Plaintiff:
SCUDDER REALTY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Sis International Trade Inc, et al v. Scudder Realty LLC
as 24-1623
Plaintiff:
SIS INTERNATIONAL TRADE INC, doing business as Royal Bee, SAGI GEIMAN and SHIR GAL
Defendant:
SCUDDER REALTY LLC
SIS INTERNATIONAL TRADE, INC. et al v. SCUDDER REALTY, LLC
as 2:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
SIS INTERNATIONAL TRADE, INC. doing business as ROYAL BEE, SAGI GEIMAN and SHIR GAL
Defendant:
SCUDDER REALTY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
GENGER et al v. CHUBB INSURANCE SOLUTIONS AGENCY, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
SAGI GENGER and ELANA GENGER
Defendant:
CHUBB INSURANCE SOLUTIONS AGENCY, INC. and ACE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv17371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BEACHBODY, LLC et al v. WYANT
as 2:2015cv00322
Plaintiff:
BEACHBODY, LLC and SAGI KALEV
Defendant:
RICHARD J. WYANT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
SAGI v. U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 2:2014cv00280
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SAGI
Defendant:
U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SAGI v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 3:2011cv01814
Plaintiff:
JOHN SAGI
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
