Cases 1 - 10 of 26
NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv07358
Plaintiff:
HOOMAN NOORCHASHM
Defendant:
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, WILLIAM SIGMUND, JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitiously named) and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
SIGMUND et al v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv03399
Plaintiff:
NATALIA SIGMUND and JOSEPH SIGMUND
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DUMONT v. KOZIERACHI
as 2:2019cv00424
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUMONT
Defendant:
SIGMUND KOZIERACHI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Epstein v. Ellie Mae, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00486
Defendant:
Robert J. Levin, A. Barr Dolan, Carl Buccellato and others
Plaintiff:
Carole Epstein
Kent v. Ellie Mae, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Robert J. Levin, A. Barr Dolan, Carl Buccellato and others
Tait v. New Castle County Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Defendant:
CPL/3 Mousley, Detective Potter, Allen G. Herring and others
Plaintiff:
John Harry Tait, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Arbitrage Fund v. Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00861
Plaintiff:
Arbitrage Fund
Defendant:
Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc., Robert C. Skaggs, Jr., Stephen P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SIGMUND v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SIGMUND
Defendant:
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ALEEM et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05854
Plaintiff:
TAUHEEDAH ALEEM , EVELYN ARNETTE-PAYAN , CLARICE BAZILE and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
