Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DE SOUZA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Micaela De Souza
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r o KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SOUZA et al v. M.A.G. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02913
Plaintiff:
DENISE TRLICA, ALANA MARIE SOUZA, Laurie Young and others
Defendant:
M.A.G. ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as CHEERLEADERS and JOHN MEEHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SOUZA v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06255
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN SOUZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. ARTKAN, INC.
as 5:2020cv00882
Plaintiff:
INA SCHNITZER, DENISE MILANI, CIELO JEAN GIBSON and others
Defendant:
ARTKAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SOUZA v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05923
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SOUZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOUZA et al v. CONTROVERSY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00691
Plaintiff:
JAIME EDMONDSON-LONGORIA, BROOKE JOHNSON, ALANA MARIE SOUZA and others
Defendant:
CONTROVERSY, LLC and MARK LATORRE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SOUZA et al v. BRASS SADDLE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00683
Plaintiff:
JESSICA GOLDEN, CIELO JEAN GIBSON, ALANA SOUZA and others
Defendant:
BETTY ANN BISACCA and BRASS SADDLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00354
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
