Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Talbott v. Credit Acceptance Corp.
as 5:2021cv05133
Plaintiff:
Derrick Talbott
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Talbott v. Credit Acceptance Corp.
as 1:2021cv01939
Plaintiff:
Derrick Talbott
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Steinberg v. PA State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
Norman Steinberg
Defendant:
PA State Board of Pharmacy, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, K. Kalonji Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNIM v. MILLER et al
as 2:2017cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARK J. BUNIM
Defendant:
LAWRENCE MILLER, HOWARD L. CARVER , ALLEN R. FREEDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TUNSIL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01040
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KENNEY, RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL et al v. EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
as 2:2013cv05121
Plaintiff:
MARION CAMPBELL , HANS KUHNI , ROBYN SORENSON and others
Defendant:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TALBOTT et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv33958
Plaintiff:
LESLIE V TALBOTT , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TALBOTT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65496
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J TALBOTT and ETHEL TALBOTT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALBOTT v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE
as 2:2011cv01015
Plaintiff:
SHARON TALBOTT
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARNARD et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01304
Plaintiff:
TALBOTT BARNARD , DONALD B. BIGGERSTAFF , SUSAN BIGGERSTAFF and others
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
