Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Phillip Tarver v. Keisha Fisher, et al
as 22-1761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP TARVER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEISHA FISHER, ADMIN. and SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
TARVER v. FISHER et al
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP TARVER
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER and SOUTH WOOD STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 21-1515
Defendant:
OFFICER BAILEY, OFFICER MCLINCH, SEARS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RICHARDS
JOHNSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09564
Plaintiff:
LATISH JOHNSON and SANDRA TARVER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster Tarver v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 20-1923
Defendant / Appellee:
DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FOSTER LEE TARVER
TARVER v. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. et al
as 3:2020cv01919
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH, DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD., SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNDIA TARVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarver v. Pennsylvania Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2020cv00199
Petitioner:
Foster Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 19-2430
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER PARKER, MRS. ADAMS, OFFICER K. FINN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Tarver v. PA Attorney General et al
as 3:2018cv02071
Respondent:
Dauphin County Common Pleas Court and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Foster Lee Traver and Foster Lee Tarver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
