Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,953
In re: Michael Reynolds
as 24-1933
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff: MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02078
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
CARTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff: DARIUS CARTER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Esmelin Guzman-Guzman, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1916
Petitioner: ESMELIN GUZMAN-GUZMAN and S. M.-G.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zumar DuBose v. USA
as 24-1870
Plaintiff: ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOLLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06156
Petitioner: CARL LEE HOLLOWAY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carlos Martinez-Sanchez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1905
Petitioner: CARLOS ANDRES MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, GLORIA VERONICA BERMESO-FERNANDEZ, C. S. M.-B. and others
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kevin Livsey v. USA
as 24-1864
Plaintiff: KEVIN LIVSEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abdush Dubose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-1815
Plaintiff: ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM BASEER DUBOSE
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?