Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Melvin Abdullah El-Amin v. Darryl Brown, et al
as 20-1926
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN S. CLARK, Dauphin County Prison, CHIEF OF POLICE THOMAS CARTER and DARRYL BROWN, Detective, Susquehanna Township Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ABDULLAH EL-AMIN
Woodward v. City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv02048
Plaintiff:
Tanel Woodward
Defendant:
Thomas Carter, Adam Sabo and City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2019cv01986
Defendant:
Police Officer John Rosinski, City of Harrisburg, Chief Thomas Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Christian J. Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Amin v. Brown et al
as 3:2019cv01335
Defendant:
Warden Brian S. Clark, Detective Darryl Brown and Chief of Police Thomas Carter
Plaintiff:
Melvin Abdullah El-Amin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santiago et al v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2019cv00898
Defendant:
John Doe, Thomas Carter, City of Harrisburg and others
Plaintiff:
Waleska Santiago, Jamie Winston and Kobe Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CARTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10205
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
