Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
EUTSEY v. FCI SANDSTONE et al
as 2:2023cv03871
Petitioner:
KEITH EUTSEY
Respondent:
FCI SANDSTONE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leroy Smith v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-1521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY L. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
HUNTER v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2020cv01253
Respondent:
WARDEN J.L. JAMISON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REAVES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2020cv00166
Petitioner:
Harold Reaves
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (C.S.C.O.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Smallwood v. Warden Butner FCC, et al
as 19-3514
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BUTNER FCC and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EUGENE SMALLWOOD
TRADER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2019cv04019
Petitioner:
OSSIE TRADER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2019cv03962
Plaintiff:
KEITH L. LEWIS, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Reed v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 19-2926
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
RODGERS v. MEEKS et al
as 1:2019cv00207
Respondent:
BOBBIE MEEKS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
MARCUS RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
