Cases 1 - 10 of 205
SHIPMAN v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 3:2024cv09212
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHIPMAN
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAC v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) et al
as 3:2024cv07294
Plaintiff:
ANNA SAC
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WAGNER v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00923
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wagner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02446
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GABEL v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERRY GABEL
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
SARVER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
WADE SARVER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
