Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Sandy Baez v. Cornell Co Inc, et al
as 11-1347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDY BAEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELL CO INC, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER CORNELL CO INC, FED BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Sandy Baez v. Cornell Co Inc, et al
as 11-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDY BAEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELL CO INC, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER CORNELL CO INC, FED BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
PATEL v. CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Defendant:
CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., GEORGE KILLINGER, MICHAEL ZENK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Patel v. Zenk, et al
as 10-4474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ZENK, Warden, CORNELL CO INC, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Miguelo Morales v. Michael Zenk, et al
as 10-4204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUELO MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden of MVCC, FBOP and CORNELL CO INC
Mandanlal Varma v. Fed Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-2838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANDANLAL VARMA
Defendant - Appellee:
FED BUREAU OF PRISONS, P. JUSTER, SSIM/FBOP, BURRELL, ADM and others
Joel Bello v. Romeo, et al
as 10-1933
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL BELLO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMEO, Doctor, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center, DAWSON, Medical Administrator, ZENK, Warden at Moshannon Valley Correctional Center and others
BAEZ v. CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
SANDY BAEZ
Defendant:
CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel DeJesus v. Michael Zenk, et al
as 10-1226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL MARIA DEJESUS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden of MVCC, CORNELL CO INC and FED BUR PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
