Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Kelly v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Alexandra B. Kelly
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
YOUNGER v. PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNGER, HIPPIETOWN, LLC and ALEXANDRA VEONI
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, PITTSBURGH NARCOTICS AND VICE, NICHOLE EHRHEART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Squatrito v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Squatrito
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company d/b/a GEICO and Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
