Cases 1 - 10 of 500
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
LABELLE v. FUTURE FINTECH GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
DENISE LABELLE
Defendant:
FUTURE FINTECH GROUP INC., SHANCHUN HUANG, JING CHEN and others
Invictus Special Situations Master I, L.P. v. Invictus Global Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Invictus Special Situations Master I, L.P.
Defendant:
Invictus Global Management, LLC, Invictus Special Situations I GP, LLC, Cindy Chen Delano and others
Cross Defendant:
UnumX
Counter Defendant:
Invictus Special Situations I, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
IGNACIO v. JIANGNANNJ LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22964
Plaintiff:
Jose Ignacio and ALBERTO IGNACIO
Defendant:
Jiangnannj LLC d/b/a Jiangnan NJC, Lei Chen, JIANGNANNJ LLC doing business as JIANG NAN NJC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
