Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 51,981
USA v. Javier Osorio
as 24-1831
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAVIER OSORIO
Heon Yoo v. Brian Barker, et al
as 24-1833
Plaintiff: HEON JONG YOO, Agent of Hank Yoo
Defendant: BRIAN BARKER, ASMA NISSAR, CARRIER CLINIC PSYCHIATRISTS and others
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff: VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant: R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
Elmer Daniels v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 24-1808
Plaintiff: ELMER DANIELS
Defendant: CITY OF WILMINGTON and PHILLIP A. SAGGIONE, Esq.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1800
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Notarc Port Investment LLC, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff: LANDBRIDGE PORT SERVICES HONG KONG LTD
Defendant: NOTARC PORT INVESTMENT LLC, NOTARC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC, COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LLC and others
Andrew Podems v. Union County Child Support Enforcement Unit, et al
as 24-1811
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. PODEMS
Defendant: UNION COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THERESA E. MULLER, Hearing Officer (spelling Muller?), JAMES HELY, Hearing Officer and others
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al v. Secretary United States Department of Health and H, et al
as 24-1819
Plaintiff: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA AB
Defendant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1805
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles Bennett v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 24-1807
Plaintiff: CHARLES BENNETT
Defendant: BAYER CORP, An Indiana Corporation, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, a New Jersey Corporation, MERCK & CO INC, a New Jersey Corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?