Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Rodney Cobbs v. Ben David
as 24-6571
Plaintiff:
RODNEY E. COBBS
Defendant:
BEN DAVID and CONNIE JORDAN
Brandon Crosby v. Larry Collins
as 24-6441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LUIS CROSBY
Defendant:
LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager of C-Building, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Correctional Operations for Virginia Department of Corrections, RANDALL MATHENA, Director of Security and Correction Enforcement for Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Joshua Jordan v. SC Corrections Office of Investigations
as 23-7211
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA BRYAN JORDAN
Respondent / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE, MATTHEW B. WATSON and RICHARD M. DARLING
Wayne Jordan v. Thomas Seltzer
as 23-7079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE ARTHUR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SELTZER, WALTER WEST, VANESSA ANDERSON, Case Management-Classification ECI and others
Malcolm Jordan v. Jordan Fly
as 23-6758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM A. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JORDAN FLY, Magistrate of Wake County Detention Center, MARY ANN BALDWIN, Mayor, WAKE COUNTY MUNICIPALITY and others
Malcolm Jordan v. Katherine Pomeroy
as 23-6557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM A. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE POMEROY and KEVIN HUBARD
Joshua Jordan v. Richard Darling
as 23-6546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA BRYAN JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD M. DARLING and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE
Jonathan Rhodes v. Joseph McFadden
as 23-6341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN DONELL EDWARDS RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH MCFADDEN, JAMES BLACKWELL, TIFFANY RAVENELL and others
Joshua Jordan v. SC Corrections Office of Investigations
as 23-6248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA BRYAN JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE, MATTHEW B. WATSON and RICHARD M. DARLING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
