Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Steven Johnson v. The State of North Carolina
as 16-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN GLENN JOHNSON, a/k/a Steven Glenn: Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL RESERVE, And all those similarly situated
Hephzibah Bates v. Jeffrey Lacker
as 15-1654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY LACKER, President, The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Hephzibah Bates v. Jeffrey Lacker
as 15-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY LACKER, President, The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Hephzibah Bates v. Federal Reserve Bank
as 15-1610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
Steven Johnson v. The State of North Carolina
as 15-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN GLENN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL RESERVE, And all those similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hephzibah Bates v. P. A. Nunley
as 13-2400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
P. A. LACEY NUNLEY, Deputy General Counsel The Federal Reserve Bank
Chong Su Yi v. SSA
as 13-2195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHONG SU YI
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES CAPITOL, WHITE HOUSE and others
Hephzibah Bates v. P. A. Nunley
as 12-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
P. A. LACEY NUNLEY, Deputy General Counsel, C. T. WOODY, RUEBEN DANIELS, Director and others
First Citizens Bank v. George Spiraki
as 12-1914
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Inc
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE NICOLAOS SPIRAKIS
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, a/k/a Federal Reserve
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.