Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Fred Murphy v. Mike Slagle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7303
Petitioner: FRED MURPHY
Respondent: MIKE SLAGLE, Warden and JOSHUA STEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2258
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Consolidation Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 23-1989
Petitioner: CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JOSEPH MURPHY, JR.
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Joel Burrell v. D. Shirley
as 23-6791
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee: D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Med Tech, SCADD, Correctional Officer and others
City of Charleston v. Brabham Oil Company, Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF CHARLESTON
Defendant / Appellant: BRABHAM OIL COMPANY, INC., COLONIAL GROUP, INC., ENMARK STATIONS, INC. and others
US v. Tony Murphy
as 23-6493
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TONY JEROME MURPHY
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1475
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Brandi Murphy v. Jonathan Franklin
as 23-1462
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDI MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee: JONATHAN FRANKLIN
In re: Boris Murphy
as 23-167
Petitioner: In re: BORIS MURPHY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?