Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 780
Tammy Bryant v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1139
Plaintiff: TAMMY HUDSPETH BRYANT
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6086
Petitioner: CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent: JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Kevin Jones v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1151
Plaintiff: KEVIN MICHAEL JONES
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Marie Becton v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1134
Plaintiff: MARIE A. BECTON
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Christopher Lumpkin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6142
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
US v. Devon Martin
as 24-4134
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DEVON WINFIELD MARTIN
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1044
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant: MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Krista Miller v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1014
Plaintiff: KRISTA KAY MILLER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner, Social Security and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
John Spaulding v. J. Streeval
as 24-6042
Petitioner: JOHN MARTIN SPAULDING
Respondent: J. C. STREEVAL, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?