Cases 21 - 30 of 2,997
Aldo DiBelardino v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ALDO DIBELARDINO
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General, PETER VINCENT CHIUSANO, MARK S. SMITH and others
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Sandra Wilder-Rhodan v. Nancy McLin
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WILDER-RHODAN, Beneficiary of Estate of George M. Rhodan
Defendant:
JUDGE NANCY CHAPMAN MCLIN, State of South Carolina, Family Court, J. GRAHAM STURGIS, JR., Attorney, VERONICA SMALLS, Attorney and others
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6371
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Ray Blanchard v. Brian Frosh
as 24-6372
Petitioner:
RAY A. BLANCHARD
Respondent:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General for the State of Maryland and WARDEN GREGORY WERNER
Larry Wangerow v. Brian Porter
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
LARRY WILLIAM WANGEROW
Defendant:
BRIAN PORTER, CLARA E. CAMPBELL, Admin. Officer "CLECA", BONNIE G. SCHNEIDER and others
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1225
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFFS, CITY OF BENWOOD, CITY OF BROCKTON and others
Appellant:
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, now known as EIDP, Inc. and others
Anthony Diggs v. Dr. Van Buskirk
as 24-6154
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT DIGGS
Defendant:
DR. VAN BUSKIRK, E, BID
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
