Cases 21 - 30 of 1,752
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Gary Williams v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6156
Petitioner:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Dept. of Corrections
Christopher Lumpkin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Hamilton Swart, III v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON H. SWART, III and RICHARD EARL DASILVA
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Siddhanth Sharma v. Demetrius Clark
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, FELIX TAYLOR, DEAN HEFFERNAN and others
Siddhanth Sharma v. Demetrius Clark
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, FELIX TAYLOR, DEAN HEFFERNAN and others
Deafueh Monbo v. Harford County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1092
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ROBERT CAMPBELL, in his official capacity as an employee of Harford County Sheriff Office, UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
