Cases 21 - 30 of 203
David Meyers v. US
as 23-6729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FNU LNU, United States Department of Justice Director, FNU LNU, Director of the Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts and others
US v. David Meyers
as 23-6722
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS, a/k/a Duke Meyers, a/k/a David Myers, a/k/a Diamond Meyers
David Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens
as 23-6692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE WARDENS, BEVINS, Lieutenant, CLARK, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6627
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. Kyle Rosch
as 23-6586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator and HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and KYLE ROSCH, Interstate Compact Administrator
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
