Cases 21 - 30 of 235
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Jr., ELLEN B. HANCOX, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL and others
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Annarelli v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JOSEPH ANNARELLI
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, KEVIN PUNTURI, Warden, Pocahontas State Correction Center, DR. MULLINS, MD, Pocahontas State Correction Center and others
US v. Timothy Murphy
as 22-7031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY LAFON MURPHY, a/k/a TJ
Clinton Barlow v. United States of America Government
as 22-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL JUDGES ASSOCIATION, USAOC GENERAL COUNSEL and others
Joel Burrell v. William Anderson
as 22-6950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent, DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous), CHRIS WALZ, Asst. Superintendent (previous) and others
Joel Burrell v. William Anderson
as 22-6870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent, DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous), CHRIS WALZ, Asst. Superintendent (previous) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
