Cases 21 - 30 of 5,059
Kanautica Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 24-6477
Plaintiff:
KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, GARY JUNKER, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction and others
US v. Maurice Williams
as 24-6472
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE QUINCY DESHAWN WILLIAMS, a/k/a Smoove
Ray Blanchard v. Brian Frosh
as 24-6473
Plaintiff:
RAY A. BLANCHARD
Defendant:
BRIAN E. FROSH, MCTC WARDEN and WILLIAM BOHRER
Jermaine Capel v. City of Norfolk
as 24-1437
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE M. CAPEL
Defendant:
CITY OF NORFOLK, CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul Burt v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6466
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEIGH BURT
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Head Virginia Prisons, DR. WILLIAM MILES, Physician and DR. HENCHCROFF, Orthopedic Specialist
US v. Anthony Williams
as 24-6453
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ray L. Dixon
US v. William Thatch, Jr.
as 24-6435
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY THATCH, JR.
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
US v. Reginald Lindsey
as 24-6436
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REGINALD WILLIAM LINDSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
