Cases 31 - 40 of 311
Miguel Garcia-Zuniga v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1136
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Michael Garcia
as 22-4700
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT GARCIA
Zenaida Garcia-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2243
Petitioner:
ZENAIDA YAMILETH GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ and A.G.P.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Aaron Goines v. TitleMax of Virginia, Inc.
as 22-2005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AARON GOINES, ALICIA ADAMS, AMANDA ALCOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. and TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
Defendant:
TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Carlos Garcia v. James Bowles
as 22-7234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. JAMES BOWLES, LT. LIVELY, ACTIVE CAPTAIN, at that time and others
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno v. J. Ridenour
as 22-7119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAZARO QUINONES-CEDENO
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. J. RIDENOUR, Education specialist, M. B. ANTONELLI, FCC Warden, PAUL ADAMS, FCI Warden and others
Mario Garcia-Balderas v. Bryan Dobbs
as 22-7095
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO ALBERTO GARCIA-BALDERAS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
Ricardo Garcia v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 22-1836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO R. GARCIA, PAUL E. JACOBSEN, GAETANO CALISE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Audi of America, Inc. and VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Jerome Garcia v. A. Enzor
as 22-1924
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
A. K. ENZOR, State Trooper and WILLIE MCCAULEY, JR., SC Trooper
US v. Aczel Cardenas-Sosa
as 22-7093
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ACZEL CARDENA-SOSA, a/k/a Jesus Garcia, a/k/a Jorge Cardenas-Sosa, a/k/a Gasel Sosa, a/k/a Jorge Cardenas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
