Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 531
David Firewalker-Fields v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-7092
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID NIGHTHORSE FIREWALKER-FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VDOC and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Patrick O. Lockhart
as 22-1951
Plaintiff / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant / Appellant: PATRICK LOCKHART
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRICK LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L. and B.L.
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER and others
Sarah Flanders v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-6941
Petitioner / Appellant: SARAH ELIZABETH FLANDERS
Respondent / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Lee Webb v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1784
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEE ANDREW WEBB
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6811
Petitioner / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Watson v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6727
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN A. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, CARL MANIS, Regional Administrator, BARRY KANODE, Warden and others
Jerad Ross v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-6700
Plaintiff / Appellant: JERAD ROSS
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Daryll Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-6551
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARYLL KEITH SHUMAKE
Defendant / Appellee: THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Walgreen Co.
as 22-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: WALGREEN CO.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?