Cases 41 - 50 of 86
James Simpson v. Martesha Bishop
as 19-6811
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARENCE M. JENKINS, Chesterfield Circuit Court, THOMAS B. HOOVER, VA Circuit Court Judge, MICHAEL JOERSTEL, Richmond Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SIMPSON
James Simpson v. Martesha Bishop
as 19-6449
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARENCE M. JENKINS, Chesterfield Circuit Court, MICHAEL JOERSTEL, Richmond Police Officer, BEVERLY WARNER SNUKALS, Richmond VA Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SIMPSON
Thomas Shrader v. State of West Virginia
as 19-6195
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS CREIGHTON SHRADER
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and AUDREY GILL, Warden - FCI Mendota, CA
Lashawn Gill v. Harold W. Clarke
as 17-7215
Petitioner - Appellant:
LASHAWN M. GILL
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Damon Wilson v. Prince George's County, Md
as 17-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and PFC GILL, ID #3361, Prince George's County Police
William C. Carawan, Jr. v. John McLarty
as 17-6353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCLARTY, RONALD MAYES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SLEDGE and others
John Behrmann v. Michael Goldstein
as 17-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. BEHRMANN, as individual and assignee of all individuals listed on Second Amended Complaint filed on 1/22/2016 (Doc No. 133) and NANCY BEHRMANN, as individual and assignee of all individuals listed on Second Amended Complaint filed on 1/22/2016 (Doc No. 133)
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN, an individual, CHRISTIE KENNETT, an individual, JOHN T. HOUK, II, an individual and others
US v. Michael Gill
as 16-6990
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD GILL, a/k/a Marcus Porter, a/k/a Mad, a/k/a Madden, a/k/a Mangler, a/k/a Manglo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
