Cases 1 - 10 of 3,954
Heferson Lemus-Sorto v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
HEFERSON EMMANUEL LEMUS-SORTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Juan Moreno Colindres v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1533
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO MORENO COLINDRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Joe Biden
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, d/b/a United Emrits of America, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, HUNTER BIDEN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and others
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Silvia Hernandez Rivas v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1515
Petitioner:
SILVIA CAROLINA HERNANDEZ RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
William Gooch v. John Hickenlooper
as 24-1509
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANTHONEY GOOCH
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Senator of Colorado, JARED POLIS, Governor of Colorado, PHIL WEISER, Colorado Attorney General and others
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner:
DAVON TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Walther Arriaza-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
WALTHER ARRIAZA-RAMIREZ, a/k/a Walter Alexy Arriaza-Ramirez
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Claudia Matute-Juarez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA ROSSANA MATUTE-JUAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
