Cases 1 - 10 of 69
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
James Cecil, Jr. v. John Bowman
as 23-6654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BOWMAN and KEVIN JONES
James Whaley v. Kudron
as 23-6397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. WHALEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. KUDRON, Shift Supervisor, ACSD, DR. WILLIAMS, NURSE AMY REAGAN and others
Sterling Singleton v. Frank Richardson
as 23-6330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK RICHARDSON and WAYNE BOWMAN
Corey Hood v. Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DEANDRE HOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, BELLAMY, Lieutenant, OFFICER WHITE, R&D Officer and others
US v. Guy Bowman
as 22-4680
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GUY BENJAMIN BOWMAN
US v. Ronnie Bowman
as 22-6956
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONNIE BOWMAN, a/k/a Young
Sterling Singleton v. Frank Richardson
as 22-6935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK RICHARDSON, WARDEN JOYNER and WAYNE BOWMAN
Defendant:
SCDC, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SHARP and others
Ricky Bowman v. Tonya James
as 22-6739
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY BOWMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
TONYA JAMES, Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Sterling Singleton v. Frank Richardson
as 22-1234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK RICHARDSON, WARDEN JOYNER and WAYNE BOWMAN
Defendant:
SCDC, BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SHARP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
